Although the content of the article(s) archived were correct at the time of writing, the accuracy of the information should not be relied upon, as it may have been subject to subsequent tax, legislative or event changes.
Government intervention fails to stop yields rising
Bombastic statements from US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and an increase in the level of Treasury buybacks wasn’t enough to reverse swelling yields on government bonds last week.
Earlier in the week, Bessent dared currency traders to bet against US Treasuries regarding the so-called yen 'carry trade’ (where Japanese investors borrow yen cheaply to buy higher-yielding assets such as US Treasuries). At the time he declared “I am the house now.”
This was followed by an increased level of US Treasury buybacks, attempting to push down yields later in the week (bond prices and yields move in opposite directions).
However, neither intervention was enough to stem the tide. Yields continued to rise in the US and elsewhere as the week progressed. On Friday, yields on 10-year US Treasuries peaked at over 4.9% - just a whisper below the psychological 5% threshold. The last time yields were this high was in 2007.
Market bets on interest rate rise
On Friday, the US Bureau of Labor Statistics revealed CPI inflation held steady at 3.4% in August. The figures suggest the inflationary pressures from the Iran conflict are feeding through to consumer prices.
Given that the price of a barrel of Brent oil jumped from around $90 at the end of August to above $108 over the weekend, there is a good chance the inflationary effects will continue to be felt when September’s CPI numbers are released next month.
The week also proved a difficult one for equities. The S&P 500 fell every day except Friday, where it staged a small recovery – though not enough to lift the index into positive territory over the week.
Carlota Estragues Lopez, Equity Strategist at St. James's Place, commented: “In the initial days of the Iran conflict, the S&P 500 was very clearly negatively correlated with oil prices, meaning it moved in the opposite direction. That relationship weakened over the summer as oil prices retreated and hopes of peace talks improved sentiment. But it has become more pronounced again as the conflict has re-escalated. Markets appear increasingly concerned about the longer-term impact of higher energy prices on inflation and interest rates. However, last week's weakness also had a significant AI-related component that was independent of oil.”
The Federal Reserve (Fed) is due to meet to discuss interest rates this week. The market is now largely pricing in a 0.25% increase. Fed Chair Kevin Warsh has so far resisted giving future guidance, but markets seem to expect at least one further rate rise before year-end.
With the US midterm elections in November rapidly approaching, incumbent Republicans in both Houses will be hoping for a de-escalation of the situation with Iran, allowing oil prices to settle sooner than later.
ECB goes early
It should be noted that US government bonds weren’t alone in feeling the heat. Yields across most developed markets continued to rise.
A major worry in Europe is the rising price of natural gas – which has reached levels not seen since 2022.
The European Central Bank (ECB) confirmed what many had been expecting when they raised interest rates by 0.25% across the eurozone last week. While the decision was already widely predicted, the hawkish tone of the commentary released alongside it was notable.
ECB chair Christine Lagarde described it as a ‘no-brainer’, and all members voting for a rise. Markets are now pricing in another rate rise in October.
AI helps UK GDP
While the UK has also been grappling with increasingly expensive national debt, there was also some comfort in better-than-expected GDP figures released in the second half of the week.
According to the Office for National Statistics (ONS), the UK economy grew by 0.4% in July, surpassing the 0% widely expected.
The information and communications sector was among the areas contributing notably to the growth. This was driven mainly by expansion in computer programming, consultancy and related activities. The ONS highlighted: “Many of the businesses reporting the largest turnover in July 2026 are involved in activities related to artificial intelligence and cloud computing. However, because of the nature of our data collection, it is difficult for us to quantify the exact impact of these types of activities on turnover.”
For the Bank of England, a healthy economy combined with the ongoing inflation pressures increases the probability of an increase to interest rates sooner rather than later.
For Chancellor John Healey, the better economic output will be encouraging news going into his inaugural Budget. An improving, healthy economy should mean one able to generate more taxes – something desperately needed in the face of rising borrowing costs.
Rise in borrowers switching to interest-only mortgages
More borrowers could be struggling with rising mortgage costs, according to data released by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) last week.1
The regulator reported that 15,200 mortgages were switched from capital repayment to interest-only loans in the second quarter of 2026, compared to 14,578 in the previous quarter.
With an interest-only mortgage, borrowers pay only the interest charged on the loan. The outstanding capital balance is payable at the end of the mortgage term. Many borrowers opt to switch to interest-only as a way of reducing their monthly loan payments for a time, due to financial pressures.
The FCA also revealed that 354,000 borrowers had reduced their monthly payments between July 2023 and June 2026, after switching to interest-only or by extending the term of their mortgage, which also acts to bring monthly payments down.
Holiday let finance enquiries grow despite challenging tax regime
The demand for holiday let mortgages has increased despite tighter tax rules and regulatory pressures affecting the sector.
Many mortgage brokers have reportedly seen a rise in enquiries relating to property finance for holiday lets.
The holiday let market has become more challenging, particularly following the abolition of the Furnished Holiday Lettings tax regime in April 2025. It means the tax environment is less favourable now for most investors.
But despite the reduced tax efficiency of holiday lets, the uptick in enquiries suggests the sector continues to appeal to investors seeking portfolio diversification.
Your home or other property may be repossessed if you do not keep up repayments on your mortgage.
Some buy to let mortgages are not regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority.
Source
1 Financial Conduct Authority, Mortgage charter uptake data – September 2026
The value of an investment with St. James's Place will be directly linked to the performance of the funds selected and may fall as well as rise. You may get back less than the amount invested.
Past performance is not indicative of future performance.
The information contained is correct as at the date of the article. The information contained does not constitute investment advice and is not intended to state, indicate or imply that current or past results are indicative of future results or expectations. Where the opinions of third parties are offered, these may not necessarily reflect those of St. James's Place.
Source: London Stock Exchange Group plc and its group undertakings (collectively, the “LSE Group”). ©LSE Group 2026. FTSE Russell is a trading name of certain of the LSE Group companies.
“FTSE Russell®” is a trade mark of the relevant LSE Group companies and is used by any other LSE Group company under license. All rights in the FTSE Russell indexes or data vest in the relevant LSE Group company which owns the index or the data. Neither LSE Group nor its licensors accept any liability for any errors or omissions in the indexes or data and no party may rely on any indexes or data contained in this communication. No further distribution of data from the LSE Group is permitted without the relevant LSE Group company’s express written consent. The LSE Group does not promote, sponsor or endorse the content of this communication.
© S&P Dow Jones LLC 2026; all rights reserved
Source: MSCI. Certain information contained herein, including without limitation text, data, graphs, charts (collectively, the “Information”) is the copyrighted, trade secret, trademarked and/or proprietary property of MSCI Inc. or its subsidiaries (collectively, “MSCI”), or MSCI’s licensors, direct or indirect suppliers or any third party involved in making or compiling any Information (collectively, with MSCI, the “Information Providers”), is provided for informational purposes only, and may not be modified, reverse-engineered, reproduced, resold or redisseminated in whole or in part, without prior written consent.
Source: Bloomberg. BLOOMBERG®” and the Bloomberg indices listed herein (the “Indices”) are service marks of Bloomberg Finance L.P. and its affiliates, including Bloomberg Index Services Limited (“BISL”), the administrator of the Indices (collectively, “Bloomberg”) and have been licensed for use for certain purposes by the distributor hereof (the “Licensee”). Bloomberg is not affiliated with Licensee, and Bloomberg does not approve, endorse, review, or recommend the financial products named herein (the “Products”). Bloomberg does not guarantee the timeliness, accuracy, or completeness of any data or information relating to the Products.
SJP Approved 14/09/2026