As Chancellor Rachel Reeves prepares to deliver her second Budget on 26 November 2025, rumours are once again circulating about what could be on the horizon. From possible tax hikes to pension changes, media coverage is full of predictions - but history tells us that acting on speculation can often lead to regret.
At Stringer Mann Chartered Financial Planners, we believe that good financial planning relies on facts, not forecasts. So, before making any major financial moves, it’s wise to wait for the official details from the Autumn Budget.
Commentators widely expect the Chancellor to announce some form of tax increases as the government seeks to meet its spending commitments and balance the books. Areas often mentioned include:
However, most rumours that surface ahead of a Budget never make it into official policy. Taking a measured approach - rather than reacting to headlines - remains the most sensible course of action.
Pensions are a regular feature of Budget speculation, and this year is no exception. There are rumours that the 25% tax-free cash entitlement could be restricted, echoing similar talk last year that ultimately came to nothing.
This kind of speculation can prompt some individuals to draw their tax-free cash early. However, as HMRC1 recently reminded savers, once the money has been withdrawn, it cannot be reversed - even if no policy change follows. For example, someone who takes £50,000 tax-free from a £200,000 pot cannot later ‘undo’ that withdrawal.
There is also speculation that the Chancellor could review pension tax relief, perhaps moving to a flat rate. While this could raise additional revenue, it risks undermining confidence in long-term savings, something many in the industry, including St. James's Place, have cautioned against.
Another area of focus is the UK property market. It is rumoured that the Treasury may be considering changes to stamp duty - possibly spreading payments over several years or even replacing it with a new property tax.
Some outlets have also speculated about:
If any of these measures were introduced, they could have a particular impact on homeowners in London and the South East, as well as those with investment properties.
In July, the government backed away from plans to reduce the cash ISA allowance following criticism from the financial sector. Yet speculation persists that changes could still be made, perhaps to encourage more people to invest rather than hold cash savings.
Similarly, inheritance tax (IHT) is often discussed as a potential revenue source. Suggestions include:
While these ideas remain just that - ideas - they do highlight the importance of flexible, long-term planning that can adapt as the tax landscape evolves.
A quick look at last year’s Budget shows how unreliable pre-Budget rumours can be:
|
Prediction |
Outcome |
|
Pension tax relief cut |
No change |
|
Tax-free pension cash reduced |
No change |
|
Pensions subject to IHT |
Implemented |
|
Gifting rule extended to 10 years |
No change |
|
CGT rates increased |
Implemented |
In short, in 2024 only some of the speculation became reality. Many investors who acted prematurely found themselves regretting their rushed decisions.
Trying to predict the contents of the Budget is rarely a sound strategy. A more constructive question to ask might be: how would a hasty decision based on speculation affect my long-term financial goals if the expected change doesn’t actually happen?
At Stringer Mann, we encourage clients to take a calm, strategic approach. If you’re concerned about potential tax or pension changes, speak to your adviser before taking any action. Together, we can ensure your financial plans remain robust - whatever the Chancellor announces.
Just click on the link to find our contact details.
The value of an investment with St. James's Place will be directly linked to the performance of the funds selected and may fall as well as rise. You may get back less than the amount invested.
The levels and bases of taxation and reliefs from taxation can change at any time and are generally dependent on individual circumstances.
Although the content of the article was correct at the time of writing, the accuracy of the information should not be relied upon, as it may have been subject to subsequent tax, legislative or event changes.